*Scriptorium Bibles: Bible and Textual Criticism Scholars*Modern Versions are Derived from the Critical Greek Text.

Michael Paul Clough – Facebook – Moderator Top Contributor  ·   · *Scriptorium Bibles: Bible and Textual Criticism Scholars*Modern Versions are Derived from the Critical Greek Text. Different Manuscripts that are Vatican Approved, Which Distort God’s True Preservation with Subtle Deficiencies and Numerous Deletions.

Scriptorium Bibles – Facebook

Dear Critical text advocates… Welcome to the entrance in front of my office, a scientific facility that spans well over 50 acres. You need clearance to come in, otherwise you will get shot… (Can you all say One Million ancient manuscripts)! You see, those of us who are -real- archaeological scientists know full well the King James Bible contains the complete word of God, and that the modern versions, are perversions…. We know this because of the actual physical historic archaeological evidence! (We actually chemically date ancient artifacts, paleographers DO NOT!!! Now!! who from among the progressive liberal Critical Text community (thinking they are smart) would like to see some really….. really….. really….. really…. really…… old ancient manuscripts!? Shall we start with ancient Babylonian clay tablets! How about some ancient Aztec stone tablets… Or what about biblical manuscripts that date from AD 80-100 from Antioch, that totally confirm the readings in the KJB. You see paleography IS NOT a real science, and textual critics are totally and completely misinformed, and a JOKE!… There is real science, and a real credible textual history that leads to the KJB,…. and then, there are Critical text knuckleheads that keep regurgitating the same old nonsense, that have no idea what they are talking about.

Bill Taylor The KJB translators drew on a Greek manuscript called the “Received Text” or Textus Receptus (TR) which has been traced back to apostolic times. Modernists say the Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus manuscripts promoted by Westcott and Hort in the late 1800s were hidden in the 4th century and “recovered” in the 19th. They are the oldest manuscripts, they say, so a translation based on them is “better” than the KJB. They are filled with errors, crossouts, and disagree with each other 3,000 times in the gospels alone.https://successful-marriage.blogspot.com/…/why-we-use…The Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus manuscripts from which modern versions are translated fail God’s condition for Biblical authority because they were not continually available. Modernists argue that God allowed His Word to be lost for 1,500 years until scholars “recovered” it. To accept this idea, we must ignore many Scripture passages or believe that God lied when He promised to preserve His Word generation by generation forever.https://successful-marriage.blogspot.com/…/why-we-use…

Bill Taylor Textual criticism is founded on unbelief. year Westcott and Hort, who led the wave of new “bible” versions, published their corrupted New Testament in 1881. They were honest about their unbelief:“In matters of textual criticism, the Bible is to be treated like any other ancient book. No special considerations are to be made concerning its claims of inspiration or preservation.”Westcott and Hort, The New Testament in the Original Greek, Introduction and Appendix, 1881